Higher resolution of the thickness as 4d idea v.03

So in my facebook I wrote that 4'th dimension is thickness, an explanation could be like this:

Say a demand graph of sushi in central station would be: at $1 quantity demanded 10.000 pieces, at $30 dollars quantity demanded 100 pieces. 

But that is in the morning, in the afternoon it would be:  $1 ask 1.000 pieces, at $30 dollars 1 piece.

The same thing with supply, with respective order: at $1 bid 1 piece to $30 bid 1.000 in the morning, in the afternoon $1 bid 10 pieces to $30 bid 100 in the afternoon.

So there were 2 - three dimensional models connected to one another. 2 xyz graphs at the beginning, 1 for the outside, and 1 for the inside... the other axis, w, lets say, would be time of day. 

Could standard deviation be presented this way? It should be, but the w axis would be what? range? a bit hard to conceptualize. To understand this easier would be to conceptualize the opposite of standard deviation, which are ideas where multiple figures are definitely true given a variable. In the sushi case the variable was the time of day. 

Therefore the 3d graph of the supply and demand would have two images on the inside and on the outside. 
Based on 2, xyz lines, the inside and the outside. 
Imagine the xyz pipes instead of lines. Pipes would have the outside layer and the inside layer

------------------------------------------

An advantage of this is from the image you could decide whether to focus on what kind of innovation, marketing innovation or cost innovation. 

During busy hours for example it would be more profitable to enhance the cost efficiency of the sushi. While during working hours it would be beneficial to not be too stingy. 

My Ultimate v.02

This is the question, is prioritizing Justice always in align with prioritizing the Truth?

I found the yes answer, and it is going to be quite a bit of an answer, 

Firstly you could observe truthfully an event like when a person is telling a lie, you could observe truthfully when a person decided not to say anything, you could observe truthfully when a person is saying the truth. The Truth is more than your speech. 

However the Truth has the room to grow, 

From my point of view, the Truth is the protocol that everything follows, that there is only one true past. So when you believed in lies, that wrong perception of yours would be a gift or a fragrant present for the Truth when they are being truthfully corrected. However, since there is also momentum for wrongness, (one wrong leads to another in one way or the other) so believing in lies is dangerous and it is unattractive for those who are predetermined to dislike some of the particular problems associated with it. 

But Faith indeed is the reason for universal war. Humans and Spirits they are attracted to faith and fighting over it. The Truth wants you to believe in Him, and the anti-truth wants you to not. For "inanimate" objects, the manifestation of it is the quantum state. For observation would determine one's truthful positions or roles, while the quantum state enriches the exploration.

We know that the Truth leads to more questions, ideas, and ambitions... the discovery of the Truth creates more spaces for the Truth to explore. When one is being agnostic, one is being neutrally attractive, meaning generally attractive, popular standard of beauty. Well that is if I'm right. But, just keeping the question on without trying to solve it will attract reasons to believe in lies, lies could be believed subconsciously, and when that side of you were exposed... its likely to be ugly. Incompetence also comes with it. 

So in relation to Justice, Justice wants to make everyone able to access whatever it is that they wanted and needed whenever they do. Justice wants to make sure the availability of what is desirable and useful all the way in the future, forever. 

Sometimes telling lies could prevent deadly, crippling events. When situations unfold, people wouldn't always have the intelligence to figure out the truthful solutions at the moment. Personally, when tragedies were avoided they were all steps towards Justice. But the preservation of lies prevents truthful problem solving in the long run. 

For that the Truth is the winner and for the sake of sustainability, the need for lies will be solved. I'm not just saying that for the sake of blind ideological fanaticism or virtue signaling, but because that is the proper, the responsible state of problem solved. I wish I will always be like that 100%

The true solving of problems requires truthful assessments. And from that angle I answered that ultimately, the prioritization of Justice is in align with the prioritization of the Truth.

Another Memory Question

Does memory has something to do with multiple personality disorder?
Maybe the person has imperfect short term memory causing him/her lost grip of patterns? But since he/she has compensated it with "backup patterns" that would took over in case of a pattern had lost cause.

Sleepy v.02

 Sensation of sleepiness came from unmet expectation of excitements

Dream and Dementia (Highly Speculative)

So this is is highly speculative,
I wonder if there is a connection between how we so easily forget dreams with dementia. Could it be that our mind has a system of its own to erase dreams? And somehow in the case of dementia, it strayed away and went for the memories of realities as well?

Dopamine and other positive emotions might prevent this, and stressing out while laying down, might confuse this system. What I mean is, while we are actively contemplating in our bed, exploring in our minds, it might came across as a dream for our subconscious... (highly speculative).

And when the nexus created were wrong, then the memory would be registered at where it supposed to be a dream, or the "hard-disks" were considered RAM or being used as RAM.

You know what, like, you're using your permanent memories for spontaneity, while your real life real time reactional systems became so underused its muscles shrank...

Something like that

Limbs of spacer

Could it be that gravity and the expansion of the universe are two of the same thing?
So in order to expand the space, "it" must grip on to something, which is matter.

So if this notion is true, the expansion out of black holes should be stronger or bigger than the expansion out of the sun for example.