1/0 v.03b

 dividing by zero is wrong. Is wrong

It is wrong for 1/0, or a lot of things. But 0/0 is a lot of things and it is not wrong

Just a thought v.02

the way to see first law could be, that energy just don't randomly change itself or energy doesn't change without reason (this grammatical thing is trivial, energy could be like the trinity the way we could be a trinity too)

the way to see the third law could be, that its a display of e=mc2 

Context v.02

Can I say that context is a point of reference for proper interpretation of the word/s?

Then, in this "context", "proper" means Truthful. The Truth is... The Truth, from my point of view, the Truth is a condition where the Truthful past could be traced back using the logic of the Truth, usually there's only one Truthful past. 

Could two accounts of the Truthful past be Truthful? or more? then the test of the Truth should be able to be applied in both of them (towards further pasts) and they would still be the Truth. However the knowledge of the Truth of the testers themselves are limited, therefore likely it is reliable that eventually one of them would be wrong. 

So when people were irresponsible talking, talking about one thing while actually sending a different message to another person without the other one had the same context for responding to it (the "real" second party had to invoke his/her own context in order to address the message because the real message wasn't anchored directly to the utterer's real context), maybe when they were bullying a person, in order to extract the proper "secondary" context of the speech, one must statistically associate it to the events that are going to be the consequence of such "message". Even this is potentially inaccurate as well and could've been a huge misunderstanding. 

However irresponsible talking can be used to abuse people, extortion, threats, were hardly attributable when someone used this method, but the subject would suffer the consequences of one of the possible "secondary" contexts of the irresponsible talking.

So how would the court of law acknowledge such phenomenon? It is only great that judges are not machines but a person. I never seen the algorithm that could Truthfully pinpoint and discern such talking (accurately) and attributed the responsibilities to the right individuals. One way is through statistics. The utterer would inflict consequences using the same logic repeatedly in the past. However this too could be too soon to be Just.

It is hard, it is very likely that this shi* is the forbidden fruit in the Garden of Eden. Maybe its just me. 

(If its true, than solving this would lead us to paradise, I mean entropy, cookie crumble, would form paradise).

Forced Individualism v.02

Individualism is about freedom but evil tends to ruin things. So now I suggest that we are in an era of privilige for individual freedom that individual rights are popularly practiced as freedom supporting. In the future in the wake of increase in entropy you would expect varieties of evil Individual freedom, forced individual freedom. 

They would force this to diversify something, but we should all be able to form social bonds with each other. Or maybe it is happening right now subtly in a secluded economy, in the future hopefully we could bring this to the open and therefore figure it out

The unfortunate principal that still have domain in reality is... the ruination of voluntary virtues by making it a coercion. I love Individualism

Spectrum of life using persistence v.04c

So the sun is hard to destroy, but if there's another star coming its way, it won't dodge by itself.

Human beings saw activities in the vulcano, they left and the mountain exploded, then he/she went back in again after.

So how big is the force relative to itself that a thing could prevail upon could indicate that its alive. In the face of primordial chaos, I want to say that some Truths are alive, this version included. Can I?

Actually more like, how inevitable is the inclination if it were to apply to other comparable entities could be usable to set apart the living and the non living, upon the prevailing of the object (that is compared)

Is this polarity real?

I invite you readers to see this:

"We are one in Justice, many in Properties. Other than that is the opposite"

Is this notion reliable? maybe, right?

Polars of Adjectives continued v.05c

 Envy x Envy = Ambition

Ambition is the opposite of Envy... is it right?

(Inspired by Full Metal Alchemist collab with War of the Visions as at 14'th of May, Raid Boss - Envy)

---------------------

Envy here is about the desire for somebody else's asset and the loathe of the state of self not owning the asset (envy could mean the inclination to ruin assets/relationships/ownerships/contracts/accesses/state out of despise towards the person, its more like a triangulation of spirits, a solid multiorganism of spirits (multispirit entity))

Ok if envy, envied itself at the point in time then that's not what I mean, that's complex. I mean Envy envied itself in the past, it will be ambition. Ambition here is aspiration towards something with certain degree of willingness to pay. 

---------------------

Off topic:

So in the Bible it mentioned about a jealous God, lets not equate envy and jealousy too quickly for now. However kind of make sense isn't it if a murderer got what he wanted from the murder, the family of the victim would be looking at the ownership with despise. Was it jealousy, envy? Probably not something we would say for the occassion but I'd say that that is what Godly jealousy is.

Edit: Probably what characterized envy out of jealousy the most is the despise towards the person.

Hypothesis: There's a preferable sustainable benefit in reducing the magnitude and frequency of credit in a civilization v.03

My assumption is that stakeholders wouldn't incorporate the new opportunities that the credit brings, let's say a new chemical invention that made certain products cheaper, the indirect effects of the phenomenon is cancelled out if the people answered by more credit on their ends. Such would only amplify what's immidiate or comprehensible, however if the community's willing to wait for the new equilibrium then the mutual sustainable inventions and relationships would optimize the economy holistically. 

There's the problem as well, because of the onslaught of fresh funds that's not targeted based on deep network positioning, rather, the chasing of sensational returns... it's reasonable to suspect that the economy is confused and never actually reached a healthy equilibrium which is entirely possible to obtain. 

One of the benefit of reaching the state of new equilibriums is the ability to specialize without experiencing considerable penalties. The sensibility to halt such specialization and to diversify to another thing that's also could be scaled up with minimal costs, the sensibility and the synergy would be utilized. Currently it's relatively unutilized given if the hypothesis is correct. 

Another would be to made available chances of fresh innovation to be nurtured (with lucrative returns), to be relevant, and gained mass, before the next big projects were introduced. Such innovations would be more compatible with other segments of the economy because of the synergy between people that are more concentrated and not distracted 

I realize that this whole thing maybe insignificant, given the case where it's proven to be significant I should point out that we shouldn't interfere with the natural market mechanism of profitability and meritocracy. The way to go about this is to head towards the direction of "doing it proper".

Weird Weird happening

 Today weird thing happened to me,

First I message a person, and I remembered his name I wrote on the message app but I ended up sending the message to another person. Probably I didn't pressed enter or something

Then I dreamed of seeing a white teenage girl that stayed at another person's house, adults. She was being abused that she often "ordered" to bathe in a pool (like a baptism pool) in front of her room before being allowed to do another thing. Probably it's a custom, and she asked me to help her, she gave her hand and I reached out to hold it, her flesh was half dead. Her room got two doors front and back, the back leads to the main house, the front leads to the baptism pool. Yes that's the front and back somehow. 

The second dream I was taken by my father to a relative in my hometown, he was a very old man with wide bone structure and square face, tall and with full hair not bald. Like those in mafia movies. But now he's rather unhealthy and often wet himself. His daughter said that even the curtains became yellow because of this. But I couldn't remember who they are, they lived in a narrow house with cement floors it seems in the dream, I just feel familiar but I don't know them. 

The relatives of those families had another house, so I stayed the night there. I checked out a computer where I stayed the night and opened up there's a game. In the game you could log into another world where there were royalties and dinosaurs. The dinosaurs were smart enough to be intelligent but they are not really as smart as humans. They were used for hard labor and often treated unfairly, like slavery but that would be the worst case, but also that's pretty often. I got transported in the middle of a bookstore, like a modern bookstore and I remembered vaguely that somehow we could choose a royalty faction to use or a couple of royalties, or something like that. Then I recommended the game in a recommendation center, only I recommended royalties that's administering the bookstore.

Then the man who owned the room went in, and I apologized for overusing his computer, he appeared a little uncomfortable but seems like that's an ok thing as to be expected with people... The next morning I'm supposed to go home but I helped out the daughter who tried to promote the family's supermarket to university students near the house. It was a big project that she's in, it involves her whole family. As the people were trying to get into the car, I had trouble figuring out which car to jump into since they were heading towards different spots. 

After all those weird things, I stayed up for a little and this thing came into my head:

What if visceral fats were like amyloid beta, trying to protect the body from stomach acid or fungis or other things that's to be protected from?  

Feeling of Authenticity v.04

I know there are a lot of people who have done good, but can't be satiated with assurance from other people that they are good. They keep on wanting those praises like it's food. 

Try this, expose your negative and let people criticize you. Truthful side about you that people would criticize or dismiss, and when you're dismissed, thrown away, you'd emerge as a person instead of a persona

-----------

If people didn't throw you away then you'd still be authentic, but my suggestion is... when you could be yourself and you'd be yourself, that hole in your heart would say I'm full.

-----------

One would say, I'd just have close friends and family to be authentic in front of. That works as well and safer, but still everytime you went out of that circle and you'd have to be a pure persona, that's a consumption upon the state of your person. It's unhealthy. 

The moral of this post is, we as human beings should be more reasonable towards other people. That's just

But lying to have your way in is not just, better to dismiss rather than to lie. True acceptance lies in honesty. Expect a world where acceptance is not expected, we shouldn't be afraid but be prepared

Accounting for administrative friction v.04

Referring to the 2010 nobel prize in economics, market with search frictions, I think in accounting every transactions whether internal or external has a friction and should be journalled. 

------------------

Good Frictions are for the sake of keeping chaos out, bad friction facilitates chaos.

Primordial Chaos contains order also, Enemy Chaos are only about resistence against what's good

Too crazy choice of words? in terms of accounting primordial chaos is like petty cash, or clusters of COGS, or what falls outside of materiality, among others. Enemy chaos is like material misstatements or fraudulent reporting. 

So for those who are not familiar with these, I hope I could give a point of view about the intensity of the triangle strategy of confirmations and why it's worth it (and even more). 

-------------------

Primordial Chaos also bigger, like the country's political influence on the company, the health of the people in the company, etc. 

Good Frictions actually is about wisdom, you could say innovation kind of is a manifestation of it. With the accounting of administrative frictions hopefully we could facilitate all kinds of innovations from the point of view of the articulated financial statements